Monday, 14 April 2014

Collaborative Practices for organizations to address stakeholder’s complaint

In the past

      (1) Formal face to face communication. For internal, supervisor will talk to the employees in conference room. For external, organization hires research agent to conduct face to face interview to customers in the street.

      (2) Formal but indirect channel such as questionnaire. For internal, Human Resources department sends questionnaire to employees to seek for their comment. For external, like restaurant, questionnaire is put on the table for customers to leave the comment.   

Nowadays

The communication becomes informal and indirect. For both internal and external organization, employees and customers can share their complaint in social media such as Facebook, Openrice and Youtube.


Shift factors

      (1)     Rapid communication
In the past the communication platform between organization & stakeholders was restricted to just by on the telephone, mail and questionnaire. The length of time for both organization & stakeholders to receive complains and suggestions would take a very long time. Nowadays with the internet became our main social media platform; sharing became much shorter and can then avoid time consuming process for complaining even for giving suggestions. Because of that, not only the complaining and suggestion process became easier and shorter, also the actions & response time for organization also became faster. Furthermore, in the past customers tends to not complain and silent protest by not visiting the same restaurant for example; but due to the rapidness of internet convenience, we can complain via Apps such as Blackboard forum, openrice..etc. this help foster for those silent protestor to voice out; also from organization perspective, they can get a more information from various parties (passive & active people)


Photos from www.openrice.com



(2)    More information sharing/ More integration
As today’s internet is a social media platform for a collective of online channels for communities to interact and respond. This is then became one of the most important ways for customers and organization to share and get information. Online reviews, comments and online venue such as Facebook [2], twitter [3] and online forums [4] can also share comments and complaints. Therefore, organization can use these platforms for immediate responds to customers and CRM monitoring.

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/retail/walmart_emp.html




(3)      Harmonious environment
The new environment rapid communicate had bring us is not only just convenience but also help from human side to avoid direct face-to-face complain. Indirect complaints and suggestion can help lower the conflicts between organization and customer. On top of that, it could also avoid unnecessary gestures between direct human interactions.


Source from:http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20110218/00176_055.html

(4)     Flattening the organization chart/ Avoid power distance
For both organization and customer context, the ease of sharing information via various internet/intranet platform have also lower the power distance between them. They can freely comment (informal complain) rather than formal complaints which would harmonized the inter-relationship of the 2 parties.


photo from http://www.consumeraffairs.com/retail/walmart_emp.html

Photo from www.facebook.com


Why do organization & customer benefit from complaints & suggestions?

1. More methods to show Logos to organization. Logos are “content of the argument, reasons, data”. As the increasing of communication, more and more information can be shared. Consequently, stakeholders aware what their benefits are and comparison will push them to get more. As a result, the only way to get more is enlarge the pin (Thompson), and get improvement, due to everyone wants more. As David said, “Persuasion promoted understanding; Understanding breeds acceptance; acceptance leads to action”(Garvin, P9).

2. BATNA (is best alternative to a negotiated agreement) is balance to employees. Not like before that people found the job in the same town where they lived, but now where there is the good opportunity, people will go there. All the stakeholders have their own BATNA, and the way to keep them in competitive advanced is getting them improvement.

3. Organizations need for Learning organizations (win-win). The more communication, the more they can interact each other. The more interact, the more they can learn from each other. In the other ways to say is that complaints and suggestions are helping each other to get improvement. According to Hansen said, “As long as there’s an organizational culture where there is no incentive for contributing, there will be no contribution”. (Hansen, P3)



References
[2] www.facebook.com
[3]www.twitter.com
[4]http://www.discuss.com.hk/

Garvin, D,; Roberto, M.(2009). Change through persuasion. Harvard Business Review.
Hansen, M,; Nohria, N.; Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?. Harvard Business Review.

Thompson, L.(2009). Win-win negotiation: Expanding the Pie. The mind and heart of the negotiator, Pearson Prentice Hall.

Sunday, 6 April 2014

Group Blog Assignments: responding to the audience Comments on Satires of Persuasion~!!

Thank You Soooooo Much for all the positive comments from all the audience who actually read through our LONG satire of persuasions. Although it was a long post, the message we would like to share to everyone should be provoking enough. Yet there are more we would also like to share which was originally "PLANNED" to share in the comment part.

As mentioned in the last post, we are assuming there is NO political motivation from Ms.Lam. Then we analyzed how her profession(Teacher) and actions(Swore in public)  influence offspring, and the consequence & after effects of this incident. there were people support her because of "Freedom of speech" and "Justice" and not support as for a reason of "profanity word in the public is not right". A lot of public people in most of the time FOLLOW what other people's thinking & actions without thinking & analysing;  because they had been influenced by the education system in Hong Kong - "Spoon feed" system, so that they either don't think, don't analyze before making judgement; or being too political and will just oppose the opposite parties whatever they carried out.

We will now show you the second part: The "TRUTH" behind.

We will start with ignoring the background of the incident and whose right or wrong first. we are really focusing on Ms.Lam, which she claimed she is spoke for justice when she "on the way home from buying food and walked pass this incident; then she speak for justice because she did not agree with police's action". but the truth is, this was detail planned from a political party called "調理農務蘭花系:打倒港共流氓政權" [1] this party planned and set up the confrontation and conflicts, so that they could achieve their party goal - "Influence public towards Anti-China political power"
Anti China political Party 調理農務蘭花系 - Member includes Ms.Lam

Ms.Lam

Anti China party's member set up the incident, they claimed they only just walked pass.

Top: this man claimed he never met Ms.Lam before and show his support.
Bottom right: he is also a member of anti China party.

another picture had shown this man was with Ms.Lam in a different incident.
Above have shown that this was detail planned, and tell lies on everything and on every secret mission they had. The moral of story is we need to analyze and see different views before making judgement. Furthermore, we encourage Hong Kong people think holistically; do not mix personal emotion and political preference in analyzing incident we have read from the media. In Most cases, media also had their political preference and they DO dilutes other information for persuading the public towards their preferred conclusion and instigate the public.

We have shown some information and our comments on looking into data, information and trust. we have also shown the current phenomenon in Hong Kong and how people do things with a hidden agenda and political missions. WE DO NOT PLANNED TO SHOW MORE... but to leave a question for audience, we owned our brain, our thinking and views.

Do you still wanna trust the information you have received and choose to believe it?  
OR
You like to analyze your information in a holistic views and find out the truth before jump to a conclusion?

There was a comment about how we would think about "LOCUST" case.  Our views is simple, although some of the mainlanders may have affecting livelihood to Hong Kong, e.g. Transport, Hygiene, inflation...etc. this does not mean we have to put "HATRED" into play. We have not investigate too much into this case, but one thing we can comment about is the symbolic icon of "LOCUST = China Traveler" seems a bit harsh. we believe this would address in a soft way instead of a hard way. To go any further of this hatred would aggravate the conflicts between Hong Kong and China... This is not a separate case, and can go very political in the public. I suggest we need to see this from different perspectives, pros and cons; analyze our information thoroughly before immediately putting HATE, AGAINST, DISLIKE as conclusion of this.

The persuasive efficacy of satire for social improvements we have learnt through this blogging process was great. We were not just describing the case but to persuade public and provoke new thinking to our audience. The effect and influence our comic strip have a strong link between the ways we share our information, the sequence, argument we have made, discussion focus and consistence. To be successfully persuade our audience, we must know what to not do in our persuasion; According to "The Necessary Art of Persuasion" by Jay A. Conger[2], we do not do hard sell, and not do just presenting great argument. in our persuasion method  we have described our case in vivid language and  brought out discussion under different situation with evidence well provided, as Jay A. Conger [3] have also mentioned. These have provide us some solid grounds to design/planned our satire which help us gained a great success on being agreed from our audience.

Thanks to all~!

Pictures: http://news.discuss.com.hk/viewthread.php?tid=22273904

[1] https://www.facebook.com/dllmlfh
[2]  "The Necessary Art of Persuasion" by Jay A. Conger. Page 87-88
[3]  "The Necessary Art of Persuasion" by Jay A. Conger. Page 91-93